Even though there are uniform and you can convergent scientific literature toward accessory idea while the positive and negative reactions the secure and you can vulnerable styles, correspondingly, bring about inside the married life, no studies was learned that on top of that checked-out the newest details mentioned when you look at the this study, proving which ones dichotomously discriminate new attachment layout along with the fresh new magnitude regarding discrimination. Identifying the group out-of issues one characterizes each one of the attachment styles and you may proving hence points feel the greatest energy from discrimination would-be another influence that will indicate look and you can intervention agendas to own couple psychotherapy.
In this sense, the intention of this study were to evaluate whether or not the interaction, relationship variations, solution, regularity and you can intensity of conflicts details carry out discriminate people who have secure and vulnerable attachment during the heterosexual relationship. For this reason, the hypothesis tested is actually the negative interaction, strategies from assault and you can protection, volume and you will concentration of disputes details create define folks while the those with vulnerable single Catholic Sites dating attachment, in addition to open communications, opinion, fulfillment, cohesion and you may relationship modifications, and arrangement variables create characterize him or her while the people who have safe accessory styles.
People
This might be a decimal, cross-sectional research using a detailed and you will explanatory build. Minimal age male people try 20 and also the limitation try 79 (Meters = ; SD = ). The minimum age girls participants is actually 18 in addition to limitation is actually 76 (Yards = ; SD = ) ( Desk step one).
Tools
1) Sociodemographic questionnaire: Brand new questionnaire of your sociodemographic characteristics of the professionals was sent aside thanks to a survey with 14 issues you to definitely examined: many years, sexual positioning, host to house, relationship condition, amount of most recent dating, life of a past matchmaking, period of early in the day relationship, degree, functioning outside of the family, work, individual income, number of children and you will faith.
2) Experience in Close Relationship – Reduced (ECR-R-Brazil) ( Natividade Shiramizu, 2015 Natividade, J. C., Shiramizu, V. K. M. (2015). Uma medida de apego: versao brasileira da Experiences in Close Relationship Scale-Reduzida (ECR-R-Brasil). Psicologia USP, 26(3), 484-494. ): The scale assesses the anxiety and avoidance of attachment factors in the marital relationship. The ECR-R-Brazil has affirmative phrases that respondents must categorize on a seven-point Likert scale that ranges from “strongly agree” to seven “strongly disagree”. The scale has ten items, five on the anxiety factor and five on the avoidance factor. In the analysis of the main components of the items of the ECR-R-Brazil carried out in the study by Natividade and Shiramizu (2015) Natividade, J. C., Shiramizu, V. K. M. (2015). Uma medida de apego: versao brasileira da Experiences in Close Relationship Scale-Reduzida (ECR-R-Brasil). Psicologia USP, 26(3), 484-494. , with good data adequacy, Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) = 0.80; Bartlett’s sphericity test, ? 2 (66, N = 4.879) = ; p < 0.001. The final model from the confirmatory factor analysis showed an optimal fit, as pointed out in the study: ? 2 = 101.8; Degrees of freedom (df) = 25; p = < 0.001; ? 2 /df = 4.07; Goodness-of-Fit Index (GFI) = 0990; Adjusted Goodness-of-Fit Index (AGFI) = 0.990; Normed Fit Index (NFI) = 0.990; Tucker–Lewis Index (TLI) = 0.990; Comparative Fit Index (CFI) = 0.990; Root Mean Square Error of Approximation (RMSEA) = 0.025; Confidence Interval (CI) = 90%. In this study, the ECR-R-Brazil had a Cronbach's Alpha of 0.64 for men and 0.57 for women.
3) Mosmann, C., Wagner, A., Sarriera, J. (2008). A good qualidade conjugal como preditora dos estilos educativos parentais. Revista Psicologia Lisboa, 22(2), 161-182. Recuperado de- ): The new argument measure is divided into several subscales: in the first, called “conflict-disagreement”, nine goods are shown and really should be examined into a half a dozen-part Likert scale regarding the regularity in which the reason why to possess dispute conveyed took place the last 12 months, anywhere between “hardly ever” so you’re able to half a dozen “just about every big date”. Regarding second subscale, called “conflict-aggression”, around three items are exhibited speaking about the fresh new concentration of problems, this type of need to be analyzed to your a good Likert measure of five factors ranging from “never” in order to five “always”. Regarding research to adjust the size regarding English in order to Portuguese, a good Cronbach’s Alpha off 0.71 was discover. Within this studies, Cronbach’s philosophy was in fact 0.80 for men and you can 0.77 for females.
